Don't Drink the Tea. Think With the WE.

CA Building Trades Pres. Defends Apprenticeship Bill Against Steelworkers District Director Claims

An August, 2012 Chevron refinery fire rages in Richmond, CA

An August, 2012 Chevron refinery fire rages in Richmond, CA

submit to reddit  

Guest commentary in the Contra Costa Times by Building and Construction Trades Council of California President Robbie Hunter seeks to clarify the purpose of Senate Bill 54, written by Sen. Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley.  The op-ed comes in response to a piece written by United Steelworkers District 12 Director Robert LaVenture which Hunter claims contained “falsehoods” and “badly distorted the contents and the effect of Senate Bill 54.”  Hunter argues the importance of the bill and how it will keep refinery workers safe.  

Speaking of LaVenture’s piece, Hunter says:

It states that the bill “is ostensibly designed to establish a training and certification program for workers that work in high-hazard industrial facilities.” No, not “ostensibly.” The bill is designed for precisely that purpose. It, in fact, ensures that workers at dangerous refineries are trained to have the skills to be safe and efficient.

Hunter provides background on why Senate Bill 54 is necessary and why Sen. Hancock has endorsed it and campaigned for it.

The Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment’s analysis of the bill states that the author introduced the bill because, “Under existing law there are no requirements that employees of outside contractors working at chemical manufacturing and processing facilities, including refineries, have a minimum level of skills training, including public safety training. This poses a risk to public health and safety as unskilled and untrained workers may be unfamiliar with the construction work associated with such facilities, general facility operations and emergency plans.”

The analysis continues to explain that the author believes “ensuring that outside contractors that work at chemical refineries have properly trained workers through approved apprenticeship programs will reduce public health and safety risks.”

The commentary’s author acknowledges the dangers posed by these facilities and agrees that “several incidents” have occurred at them, and then dismisses them as a threat to anyone’s safety.
In fact, those “incidents” are more than a hundred explosions, fires, spills and other catastrophes that did result in many deaths, injuries and threats to communities, which were in fact linked to inadequate public safety training. That is precisely the issue SB 54 addresses, and precisely why this common-sense legislation is absolutely necessary.

Senate Bill 54 goes beyond helping to build apprenticeship programs in the state. It looks to make refineries safer by ensuring that properly trained workers make up the majority of the workforce at such facilities.  The issue is as crucial to public safety in California as it is to the apprenticeship programs of the future.  It is an attempt at oversight in an industry where failure to protect workers could mean colossal damage to the infrastructure of the state and harm to the citizens who live near such facilities.  Hunter argues that the bill will accomplish this:

To address this serious problem, the bill would require contractors at dangerous facilities such as refineries to employ a “skilled and trained workforce,” which is defined as at least 60 percent journeyman-level workers who have graduated from an approved apprenticeship program. Further, it would eliminate the incentive for contractors to use lesser trained, poorly paid workers, often brought here from other states, by requiring that the workers at these dangerous facilities be paid the prevailing wage. This sets a standard to attract the most highly skilled and productive industrial trade workers.

Pretending that worker training is unrelated to refinery safety is both naive and dangerous. As Gov. Jerry Brown’s Interagency Working Group on Refinery Safety reported: “Workers involved in maintenance, represented by building and construction trades unions, reported that training of most maintenance workers (nonrefinery employees) is inadequate. They also reported that refineries use mostly contract workers, including out-of-state workers, to conduct maintenance during planned shutdowns of a refinery process (also referred to as turnarounds), and that contract workers have less training and experience and, therefore, are less safe.”

That is exactly the problem. The lack of training of these workers at these dangerous facilities are making them less safe, both to the workers themselves and the surrounding communities.
By requiring that contractors that perform work in these volatile industrial facilities have a workforce of at least 60 percent that have graduated from a state-approved construction-trades apprenticeship program, the state of California, because of its oversight and input on these state-approved training programs, can have certainty on the quality of construction and safety during construction.

Read the entire pro-SB54 piece here.


No Comments on “CA Building Trades Pres. Defends Apprenticeship Bill Against Steelworkers District Director Claims”

No one has commented on this entry yet.

Leave a Reply

To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image